LP Pattern Intelligence — Full Dashboard

255 landing pages × 17 persuasion variables × observable Meta-ad metrics

Total LPs
255
competitor destination pages
Days running (median)
113days
long-running threshold p75 = 173d
Multi-variant LPs
≥2 active ad variants
Variables analyzed
17
persuasion dimensions
Page type
Funnel position
Methodology

Observed Strength Score = percentile rank of each pattern's mean days running (44%), variants (31%), placements (25%).

Reach & impressions unavailable for this product category in Meta's API; weights redistributed from 10/10 to days/variants/placements.

Brand-concentration flag ⚠ triggers at ≥30% share of one advertiser.

Key takeaways

White-space opportunities

Patterns scoring high on observable metrics but with low adoption (count < 25, score ≥ 67). Rare-but-strong = competitors are leaving signal on the table.

Strong Undertested
VariablePatternn% of LPs Days medVar medPlac medStrengthTop brand

Saturation alerts

Patterns with high adoption (≥25% of LPs) but mediocre observable strength (score < 65). Heavy use, no edge — don't lean on these alone.

Common Weak edge
VariablePatternn% of LPs Days medStrengthLabel

Pattern atlas — frequency × strength

Every pattern across all 17 variables, plotted by adoption (x-axis, count of LPs) and observed strength (y-axis). Hover for detail. Filter by variable below.

↗ Top-right
Common & strong — the proven backbone patterns.
↖ Top-left
Rare & strong — white-space worth testing.
↘ Bottom-right
Common & weak — saturated, no differentiation.
↙ Bottom-left
Rare & weak — likely failed experiments.